esreality mousescore 2007

Locked
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

esreality mousescore 2007

Post by dzjepp »

Recently sujoy and the folks at esr did a great readup of almost all 'gaming-grade' mice.

http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1265679

I think it's pretty unbaised and well informed. Interesting to see the mx500 come out on top (i've never owned one, and it's pretty old isn't it?) But to be fair I guess it wouldn't have rated so high if it wasn't compared with the usb rate clocked @ 1000hz. The mx518 did good which is expected.

The laser mice seem to do worse than the optical, which I guess would be accurate with many gamers saying the laser just don't feel 'right'. Guess that's why people say the g5 sucks, etc.

Anyways definately check it out if you're in the market for a gaming-grade rodent.
Azer
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Azer »

I have the mx500 and I am very pleased with it. I like the shape and the general feel of the mouse. The only problem is that when this one breaks, it's going to be quite difficult to find a replacement. There aren't many stores selling the mx500 any more :(
User avatar
Survivor
Posts: 4202
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Survivor »

don't have any complaints about the mx510 myself.

Edit: Difference between 510 and 500?
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Survivor wrote:don't have any complaints about the mx510 myself.

Edit: Difference between 510 and 500?
it's got 10 more.

510 for me.
spookmineer
Posts: 506
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2002 8:00 am

Post by spookmineer »

I have the MX510 as well. I checked, there seems to be no difference in the optical equipment as compared to the 500, I guess the same electronics are used.

Reminds me... I read a few times (long time ago) PS2 connection was better, but after seeing that 500 Hz OC (1000 Hz OC was removed) I'm wondering which really is better...

With mouserate I currently have 200 Hz with PS2, so it might be better to use USB instead and OC the USB to 500 Hz?
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

Yes if you oc the usb you should get a better experience. Try 500hz first, not everything likes 1000hz. Also, I dunno this for sure but the port you will be plugging the usb in you shouldn't use anything else in it, UNLESS I'm mistaken that it only activates the higher rate when the mouse is plugged in.

Also you might see some framerate drops in some games, depending on your hardware speeds etc. On my slowish desktop I lost like 30 frames in q3 timedemo.
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

Azer wrote:I have the mx500 and I am very pleased with it. I like the shape and the general feel of the mouse. The only problem is that when this one breaks, it's going to be quite difficult to find a replacement. There aren't many stores selling the mx500 any more :(
Seems like newegg has a ton of them things. I might get one since it's pretty cheap.
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

mx series mice get even better if you remove the weight block inside, also.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
Azer
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Azer »

Foo wrote:mx series mice get even better if you remove the weight block inside, also.
Some people like it when the mouse is heavier though, so this is an opinion. I have removed the weight block myself and found it alot better.
c0ld
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:44 am

Post by c0ld »

same here.


and that said I still dont understand the point of the adjustable weights you see in the logitech g7 and Creative fatal1ty 1010 and 2020.


I really wish Sujoy tested the mx500 and mx300 at 500hz.
[color=#408000]m1ndphuq[/color]
Locked