In the Name of the Kingdom
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
oh, it gets better than that:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0486640/
starring the younger brother from Titus (does anyone else even remember that show? it was pretty funny.)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0486640/
starring the younger brother from Titus (does anyone else even remember that show? it was pretty funny.)
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
WE SHALL GOUGE EVIL FROM ITS SHELL AND DIP IT'S SUCCULENTNESS IN LEMON BUTTERseremtan wrote:"tonight we dress our wounds, and bury our dead. tomorrow we gouge evil from its shell"
AND THE DAY AFTER THAT WE DINE... IN HEEEEELLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
Jason Statham, boo yeah this move will be acceptably good.
-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
The post above mine was made by a fucking retard.
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
looks shit, statham or not.
OT, but in other movie news - just read that apparently there's going to be a remake of 'the warriors':
OT, but in other movie news - just read that apparently there's going to be a remake of 'the warriors':
why, for fucks sake. whyA modern-day remake of the film is set to be directed by Tony Scott, with a tentative release date of 2008. The remake will include real gang members and try to create a modern version of the story, set in Los Angeles. [4]

Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
please god don't let uwe boll make the half-life movie
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
who would want to watch a movie that's just 2 hours of someone hiding behind a box anyway?
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0473075/
But as far as i've heard they fucked up the story beyond recognition
But as far as i've heard they fucked up the story beyond recognition
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
'unleashing a sandstorm'
oh no... not a sandstorm! :/
oh no... not a sandstorm! :/
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
That and Jerry Bruckheimer is only marginally better at making movies than Bol.Survivor wrote:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0473075/
But as far as i've heard they fucked up the story beyond recognition
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
lol, that title screen with the empty faces says it all: shitty actors in unbelievable roles 
Jesus Henry Christ what a fucking LoTR rip.

Jesus Henry Christ what a fucking LoTR rip.
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
exactlyRyoki wrote:Dungeon Siege? How the hell do you base a movie on dungeon siege? That game had the most uninteresting, uttely generic storyline i've ever come across in an rpg...
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
hah, awesome.4days wrote:looks shit, statham or not.
OT, but in other movie news - just read that apparently there's going to be a remake of 'the warriors':why, for fucks sake. whyA modern-day remake of the film is set to be directed by Tony Scott, with a tentative release date of 2008. The remake will include real gang members and try to create a modern version of the story, set in Los Angeles. [4]
And as for why... they already did assault on precinct 13 about 2 years back now..... twas only a matter of time
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
why do people keep giving that retard money to make terrible movies?menkent wrote:oh, it gets better than that:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0486640/
starring the younger brother from Titus (does anyone else even remember that show? it was pretty funny.)
oh, and shame on dave foley and turkish for getting mixed up in one.
-
- Posts: 396
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 2:53 pm
Re: In the Name of the Kingdom
Good question. According to wikipedia, it's the German government.Dr_Watson wrote: why do people keep giving that retard money to make terrible movies?
Thanks, Germany!"Maybe you know it but it's not so easy to finance movies in total. And the reason I am able to do these kind of movies is I have a tax shelter fund in Germany, and if you invest in a movie in Germany you get basically fifty percent back from the Government."