Avatar
Re: Avatar
Bugger it, the girlfriend says she wants to see this one. Can I opt for a 3D blindfold and surround sound earplugs, do you think?
Re: Avatar
no the movie dumbo, not the glasses...GONNAFISTYA wrote:There is nothing "ground breaking" about having to wear polarized 3D glasses
Re: Avatar
It doesn't come out until the motherfucking 17th.stuntcock wrote:so where's the motherfucking review Mr. midnight tickets?? Was Smurfatar any good?
-
GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
Re: Avatar
So spell out what's so ground breaking about the movie. Or are you just forming your opinion around the opinions of others?scared? wrote:no the movie dumbo, not the glasses...GONNAFISTYA wrote:There is nothing "ground breaking" about having to wear polarized 3D glasses
Fag.
Re: Avatar
This review reaffirmed what I was hoping for:
http://techland.com/2009/12/11/avatar-t ... of-movies/
Also, check out the reaction chat link. Some mild spoilers.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/avatar/ ... entReviews
http://techland.com/2009/12/11/avatar-t ... of-movies/
Also, check out the reaction chat link. Some mild spoilers.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/avatar/ ... entReviews
Last edited by bitWISE on Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Avatar
Groundbreaking or not, I want to see this film.
Re: Avatar
I can't decide if I want to see this in 3D or not...
Re: Avatar
Not all that impressed by the clips I saw.
Might argue that you don't see it in all its 'full 3D glory', but still I bet any Pixar movie would give it a run for its money.
Might argue that you don't see it in all its 'full 3D glory', but still I bet any Pixar movie would give it a run for its money.
Re: Avatar
I don't know. I've never seen a film in 3D, and I don't know if I want to break myself in on this film. I have mixed feelings about it, cause on one side I find that 3D is just a cheesey gimmik. I guess I could just watch it twice...Fender wrote:why wouldn't you?
Re: Avatar
I liked UP in 3-D. The glasses are light and I forgot I was wearing them, although I wear glasses daily and put in contacts for the movie. The effect isn't gimmicky like it used to be years ago. They don't wave things over the audience. The movie just happens to be 3-D.
-
Chupacabra
- Posts: 3783
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 7:00 am
Re: Avatar
is it better to wear glasses or contacts for 3d movies? i dont wear either..im just curious.
Re: Avatar
Well, you need to wear the special glasses for the 3D effect. Wearing two pairs is not really practical, so I wore contacts and put on the 3D glasses.
Re: Avatar
lol at the ostentatiously skeptical stupidity in this thread.
Yes, it's Dances With Ferngully, but it's also James Cameron, so for every glowing blue bestiality scene there's going to be a vicious fucking gunfight.
I'm as cynical as the rest of you when it comes to movies but seeing as Avatar is solidly in the pluses on RottenTomatoes, I bought my tickets last night.
Yes, it's Dances With Ferngully, but it's also James Cameron, so for every glowing blue bestiality scene there's going to be a vicious fucking gunfight.
I'm as cynical as the rest of you when it comes to movies but seeing as Avatar is solidly in the pluses on RottenTomatoes, I bought my tickets last night.
Re: Avatar
That has to be the shortest and least stupid film review you've ever posted. Hang on a sec....
Re: Avatar
Bad thing is, it's not his review, it's his preview...
Re: Avatar
Gonna watch it tonight, in THREE DEEES. Best be good or I'm blaming you guys on the interwebs.
-
GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
Re: Avatar
Well...after all the hype and the links posted, everyone seems to be saying,"It'll change the way we make and watch movies." I recall people saying the exact same things about the effects for LOTR, The Matrix and a bunch of other films. I've come to the conclusion that no matter how good or bad this film is, it'll forever be defended by mindless fanbois who will squawk loud and long enough for everyone to be convinced one year from now that it's "the best movie evar".
On a more hilarious note, I heard on the Rachel Maddow show that a moronic blogger is complaining that Avatar isn't "right wing" enough and shows a bunch of "liberal ideals". Apparently he's pissed off that the movie doesn't glorify right wing ideals such as greed, war, invasions/occupations and strip mining.
On a more hilarious note, I heard on the Rachel Maddow show that a moronic blogger is complaining that Avatar isn't "right wing" enough and shows a bunch of "liberal ideals". Apparently he's pissed off that the movie doesn't glorify right wing ideals such as greed, war, invasions/occupations and strip mining.
Re: Avatar
Just got back and I figure i've got a few minutes before bed, so i'll share my thoughts:
The 3D isn't just a gimmick, it is absolutely essential to immersive yourself in the world. The entire planet looks and feels alive - it really is next level stuff. This is not to say that it would work for every film, cos it certainly wouldn't. But the lush forests and all the interesting creatures just work so much better with the 3D and depth of field effects. Saying that, the high-speed action scenes did hurt my eyes after a while, simply because there is so much to absorb and everything hits you so fast.
The CGI is fantastic and used quite tastefully. George Lucas is going to have a wet dream when he sees this.
The story is nice if cliched to the max. The best analogy I can think of at this moment in time is like playing MW2 - horribly linear and on familiar rails from start to finish, but it's a great ride while it lasts. The characters were also familiar (hard assed military commander, nerdy scientists who care for the planet more than people, the protagonist who somehow manages to gain the trust of an entire alien race within minutes etc....) but they worked well.
It may change the way we look at movies, but it certainly doesn't change anything from a narrativre standpoint. But I guess thats not the point... its a really enjoyable, feel-good popcorn movie, which doesn't make you think much, but will keep your brain happy for nearly 3 hours. I liked it.
The 3D isn't just a gimmick, it is absolutely essential to immersive yourself in the world. The entire planet looks and feels alive - it really is next level stuff. This is not to say that it would work for every film, cos it certainly wouldn't. But the lush forests and all the interesting creatures just work so much better with the 3D and depth of field effects. Saying that, the high-speed action scenes did hurt my eyes after a while, simply because there is so much to absorb and everything hits you so fast.
The CGI is fantastic and used quite tastefully. George Lucas is going to have a wet dream when he sees this.
The story is nice if cliched to the max. The best analogy I can think of at this moment in time is like playing MW2 - horribly linear and on familiar rails from start to finish, but it's a great ride while it lasts. The characters were also familiar (hard assed military commander, nerdy scientists who care for the planet more than people, the protagonist who somehow manages to gain the trust of an entire alien race within minutes etc....) but they worked well.
It may change the way we look at movies, but it certainly doesn't change anything from a narrativre standpoint. But I guess thats not the point... its a really enjoyable, feel-good popcorn movie, which doesn't make you think much, but will keep your brain happy for nearly 3 hours. I liked it.
Re: Avatar
Cool, thanks for that brisk. 
Did you see it in ReadD 3D or IMAX?
Did you see it in ReadD 3D or IMAX?