Xbox thread

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
phantasmagoria
Posts: 8525
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by phantasmagoria »

lol
[size=85]
Plan B
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Plan B »

Well, at least they listen to and act on criticism.
Still, a lot of goodwill toward them down the drain.

It's just like politics I suppose; announce draconian measures to test the water, and then when there's a massive backlash compromise to show how reasonable you are.
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by xer0s »

This is great. But the PS4 is still more powerful (no?) and $100 cheaper.

Was there ever a statement as to why they made all the ridiculous restrictions in the first place?
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Eraser »

xer0s wrote:Was there ever a statement as to why they made all the ridiculous restrictions in the first place?
$$$
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by xer0s »

Of course, but they can't just tell us straight up they're doing it for the money. Surely they tried to make it sound like it was for our own good...?
Plan B
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Plan B »

It's not a disgusting crippling sadistic fascistoid moneygrabbing measure, it's a feature! :up:
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by bitWISE »

To move the industry away from discs and towards digital distribution. It was also supposed to save the consumer money since the publishers wouldn't have to compensate for trade or rentals.

There was some post where a secret MS employee tried to rationalize it all.
Plan B
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Plan B »

bitWISE wrote:To move the industry away from discs and towards digital distribution
Didn't we do that, like 6 years ago?
I haven't bought any physical media since 2007.
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by xer0s »

So they want to be the Steam of consoles? Got it...
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Eraser »

Plan B wrote:
bitWISE wrote:To move the industry away from discs and towards digital distribution
Didn't we do that, like 6 years ago?
I haven't bought any physical media since 2007.
For the PC, with Steam, digital distribution is a way of old already. With consoles, not so much. I bet 99.9% of sales are still disc based, mostly because the only digital download option you have for the Xbox 360 is through Games on Demand, where they have a limited library of games on offer (mostly games that are at least a few months old) and they're all priced $60.
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by xer0s »

Plus you can fill your hard drive up pretty quick on a console...
Plan B
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Plan B »

Yeah, guess you're right. Haven't touched my xbox ever since it decided to RROD on me.
But surely digital distribution is the only way to go for the next xbox and ps.

They feature 500 gb+ drives. That would allow you to store at least 50 games before you have to clear out your junk.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Transient »

I doubt new games are going to be under 10GB apiece.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by bitWISE »

Eraser wrote:For the PC, with Steam, digital distribution is a way of old already. With consoles, not so much. I bet 99.9% of sales are still disc based, mostly because the only digital download option you have for the Xbox 360 is through Games on Demand, where they have a limited library of games on offer (mostly games that are at least a few months old) and they're all priced $60.
State of Decay is an XBLA download only game that just released. It broke the original game sales record by posting 500,000 purchases in just the first week. So there is definitely solid demand for downloaded games on the console but AAA titles just don't release that way.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by MKJ »

Transient wrote:I doubt new games are going to be under 10GB apiece.
A good point actually. Ps3 has had mandatory installs since launch, and im not sure about the ps4. Pretty sure itll require installs as well tho. I think it has to do with tje bandwidth between bluray to ram vs hdd to ram.

Still typical that ms is getting bashed for mandatory installs on the One even though Sony has done this for years.
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Xbox thread

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Doombrain »

User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Eraser »

MKJ wrote:
Still typical that ms is getting bashed for mandatory installs on the One even though Sony has done this for years.
MS is rightly bashed for it, and so is Sony. Mandatory installs on a console, especially taking as long as they do (I've heard 10 mo.Ute installs is not uncommon?) is just bullcrap.
U4EA
Posts: 2894
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by U4EA »

MKJ, can you clarify what you mean by mandatory installs on the PS3? Some games might require you to do this, but it's not true for all games. Is that what you mean, that it's mandatory for some games?

I don't really have a problem with this, as it may be necessary for a smoother game experience rather than loading from a spinning disc.
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by bitWISE »

I've seen a few games install some data but not all. MGS 4 was the worst.

Ps3 updates on the other hand... Now those were unbearable.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by MKJ »

My life is a lie! I always thought games had to be installed in order to play. Never heard otherwise either. In fact, a friend of mine switched from ps3 to 360 a ywar ago and he was pleasantly surprised that he could just pop in a game and play on 360

Well then. That changes things.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Doombrain »

so who's ordering one?
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Don Carlos »

I don't think you will find many people at the moment. I know quite a few people who are going PS4 though...
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Doombrain »

even though there's more pre-orders for xbox?
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Xbox thread

Post by Don Carlos »

Is there? I wouldn't have expected that in fairness - kind of shocked me. I would have expected a small surge given the back tracking on Microsoft's part, but all the negative press around it before would have drawn me into saying the PS4 would have been miles ahead. Especially with stats like this being bounded around;

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/PS4-Ta ... 56837.html
Post Reply