Are you a spatial savant?
Are you a spatial savant?
how well can you do on this quiz...
http://psych.io/spatial/
i gave up after the first one... my head exploded.
http://psych.io/spatial/
i gave up after the first one... my head exploded.
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
5 out of 9...
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
8/9. Shit... breezed through most of them but wasn't paying attention and did a stupid mistake on #6.


[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
Tricky shit. 8 and 9 threw me for a loop, my brain was leaking out my fucking ears. I got 5 of 9 in about 10 mins.
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
Typical fucking level editor.obsidian wrote:8/9. Shit... breezed through most of them but wasn't paying attention and did a stupid mistake on #6.
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
7 out of 9 here. For the first 5 I simply looked at what the arrow would be pointing at.
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
9/9 I found the first 2 the most difficult cause I was trying to do it in a random manner, but then I realized there are some pretty straight forward associations you can make that can easily pluck out the odd ones.
I would basically just try to visualize only 4 sides(squares) that complete a loop(tube). By simply ignoring the other 2 squares that cap off that loop I completely removed the 3rd dimension's difficulty. It made it feel alot more like a simpler 2 dimensional problem.
Then I would see if the other three also complete the same 4 side loop in the same order ... and for the later ones, I would also check if those shapes also pointed the same direction in relation to the 4 sided loop.
after I went through the pain of mentally folding the first two, the ability somehow came naturally...
ps
I'm high
I would basically just try to visualize only 4 sides(squares) that complete a loop(tube). By simply ignoring the other 2 squares that cap off that loop I completely removed the 3rd dimension's difficulty. It made it feel alot more like a simpler 2 dimensional problem.
Then I would see if the other three also complete the same 4 side loop in the same order ... and for the later ones, I would also check if those shapes also pointed the same direction in relation to the 4 sided loop.
after I went through the pain of mentally folding the first two, the ability somehow came naturally...
ps
I'm high
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
Thought I killed it but only got 7 out of 9.
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
The key.Tsakali wrote: ps
I'm high
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
lol dumb ppl...scared? wrote:5 out of 9...
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
-
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
I didn't read your scores before I took it and felt like a boss when I got 9 but that seems to be not uncommon.
My job entails a lot of multi-part moldmaking which requires exactly this kind of spacial thinking and I enjoy it, however, I don't think it's a special skill - it just requires a fair bit of time and thought if you're unpractised unless you're a complete spastic. It's usually the best molds that are the ones you've taken time to work out and the best moldmakers are the ones that spend time in the initial phases in order to work out their split lines and undercuts rather than rushing straight ahead.
I'd say most people could score 7+ on this with ease if they took their time and I wouldn't be surprised if this test was actually testing something else to do with waning concentration levels amongst younger ages, sot sure though.
My job entails a lot of multi-part moldmaking which requires exactly this kind of spacial thinking and I enjoy it, however, I don't think it's a special skill - it just requires a fair bit of time and thought if you're unpractised unless you're a complete spastic. It's usually the best molds that are the ones you've taken time to work out and the best moldmakers are the ones that spend time in the initial phases in order to work out their split lines and undercuts rather than rushing straight ahead.
I'd say most people could score 7+ on this with ease if they took their time and I wouldn't be surprised if this test was actually testing something else to do with waning concentration levels amongst younger ages, sot sure though.
[size=85]
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
Btw...I just clicked everything random...I win...
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
That's interesting, cause I got bored and stoppedphantasmagoria wrote:...
I'd say most people could score 7+ on this with ease if they took their time and I wouldn't be surprised if this test was actually testing something else to do with waning concentration levels amongst younger ages, sot sure though.

Re: Are you a spatial savant?
Really? I thought someone like you would really be good at stuff like this.
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
Firstly: there's no-one like me; I am unique.
Secondly: when you're good at something you don't necessarily find it interesting; in fact it can make it boring.
I found it easy at first but became less and less interested (more bored) as I went through the challenges.
Secondly: when you're good at something you don't necessarily find it interesting; in fact it can make it boring.
I found it easy at first but became less and less interested (more bored) as I went through the challenges.
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
Apart from Rainman.DTS wrote:Firstly: there's no-one like me; I am unique.
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
Rainman has autism, he's not an idiot.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
And DTS is a beautiful unique butterfly.
Not a very smart one though, because a smart butterfly would just finish the task effortlessly.
Not a very smart one though, because a smart butterfly would just finish the task effortlessly.
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
It is much harder than most tests, and the mean score from our testing so far has been 3.64/9.

[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
This surprises you? Why? People are dumb.
Why they subject themselves to these tests is anyone's guess.
Why they subject themselves to these tests is anyone's guess.
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
probably a way to influence your desire of completing it. I mean why would anyone bother spend time on this if their ego driven 'above average' self perception wasn't tickled.obsidian wrote:It is much harder than most tests, and the mean score from our testing so far has been 3.64/9.
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
No you didn't.scared? wrote:Btw...I just clicked everything random...I win...
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
Whatever you say, Cliff Clavin.DTS wrote:Firstly: there's no-one like me; I am unique.
Secondly: when you're good at something you don't necessarily find it interesting; in fact it can make it boring.
I found it easy at first but became less and less interested (more bored) as I went through the challenges.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Re: Are you a spatial savant?
Did all of you solve these in your head or use pen/paper?