Avatar

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Re: Avatar

Post by Geebs »

bitWISE wrote: single interconnected life essence.
I take it the hippie bullshit is strong in this one. Every review I've read makes it sounds like the whole film is a prolonged stare up Jar Jar Binks' arse-crack (in 3D!), and then goes on to say how good it is - which surely makes no sense.
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Re: Avatar

Post by Geebs »

Tsakali wrote:lol, people better than us at anything makes us feel uncomfortable... sad little planet we live in.
I think sliverOfManhood's reviews are actually some kind of hugely elaborate troll. There's no way anyone could be that much of a tool without occasionally expressing shame.
axbaby
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by axbaby »

i will see it sadly in 2D in a few days.

is this the prequel to all movies being 3D and no more illegal downloads?
[color=#FF0000][WYD][/color]
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Avatar

Post by andyman »

Think of it like this (when silver says the character types are way overdone): How else is Cameron going to match everything else in the movie... everything in it is 10x more than normal (size, language, etc)


... unless he is a Camoron....?
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Avatar

Post by Foo »

then who was phone?
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Avatar

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

I saw Avatar last night.

The story, while long, doesn't feel like it's dragging on. It's basically "Dances With Wolves" so no real fault there. The 3D effect - IMHO - didn't really change anything for me. What I mean is that the movie was visually stimulating but it didn't have to be 3D in order to be entertaining....the 3D simply added to the experience. However, some shots with fast-moving elements were basically ruined by the 3D effect and several shots with foreground elements left me wondering what part of the frame I should be focusing on.

All in all, a decent film that isn't entirely original in any sense but is engaging throughout and has probably one of the highest quality effects of any movie in a long while. The cinematography and audio were very well done which simply made the entire package a worthwhile movie to spend $20 at a theatre.

But this movie is in no way, shape or form the "revolutionary" film the hype said it would be (fuck u go0f)...which was the whole point of this thread...at least for me. I already wish every PR and marketing person on this planet would simultaneously die a horrific death, and at the end of the day all the hoopla for this film did was reinforce that POV.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by MKJ »

if your wish came true you'd be out of work :up:
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Avatar

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Yeah....but they'd all die horrific deaths. :up:
feedback
Posts: 7449
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by feedback »

My friend is interviewing James Cameron tomorrow, any serious questions you want him to be asked? I'd go to the interview but I happen to have class exactly before and after the interview :'(
I love quake!
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by Nightshade »

Yeah, why was the story so derivative and seemingly secondary to the visual effects?
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by MKJ »

cos people likes eyecandy over a compelling story - less brainwaves needed.
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by xer0s »

Maybe the effects are so huge that a storyline couldn't possibly compete with it?
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by bitWISE »

Because James Cameron was an engineer who decided to become a special effects guru back in the 70s and he is the one who wrote the story.

Feedback. Could he ask for any details about how the final cut of the film was rendered? Number of machines, specs, etc. And the obvious one, how many other movies are planned for Pandora?
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by plained »

tell him plained says eeyy
it is about time!
User avatar
Mat Linnett
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2000 7:00 am
Location: The Grizzly Grotto

Re: Avatar

Post by Mat Linnett »

bitWISE wrote:Because James Cameron was an engineer who decided to become a special effects guru back in the 70s and he is the one who wrote the story.

Feedback. Could he ask for any details about how the final cut of the film was rendered? Number of machines, specs, etc. And the obvious one, how many other movies are planned for Pandora?
I can answer in a round-about way; several post houses in London were given segments of the film to render as far as I know. It probably wasn't just London, but I heard about the London companies as there were serious worries a couple of weeks before release that the render wouldn't be finished.
At least one of those companies was MPC on Wardour Street. I'm not familiar with their effects machines as we mainly support their edit suites and SAN.

Of course, that would be an interesting, if slightly pointed question. Is it true that there were worries about the render finishing on time?
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

Ask him if that was Sarge.
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by bitWISE »

Mat Linnett wrote:
bitWISE wrote:Because James Cameron was an engineer who decided to become a special effects guru back in the 70s and he is the one who wrote the story.

Feedback. Could he ask for any details about how the final cut of the film was rendered? Number of machines, specs, etc. And the obvious one, how many other movies are planned for Pandora?
I can answer in a round-about way; several post houses in London were given segments of the film to render as far as I know. It probably wasn't just London, but I heard about the London companies as there were serious worries a couple of weeks before release that the render wouldn't be finished.
At least one of those companies was MPC on Wardour Street. I'm not familiar with their effects machines as we mainly support their edit suites and SAN.

Of course, that would be an interesting, if slightly pointed question. Is it true that there were worries about the render finishing on time?
Cool, thanks. That was actually the first thing I wondered when I heard it was being released this winter. I had just read about how it took 50 hours to render each frame and then the next thing you know there's a release date. Wonder how much raw data it was.
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Avatar

Post by andyman »

Ask him what we can expect in blu ray from this movie (3d, shit ton of extra features, directors cut, etc)

Also tell him i'm a huge fan sayin EYYYY
Terminator 2 is an absolutely perfect movie IMO and tell him he is the tip of the spear as far as pushing the next big things in movies
m4shke
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:11 pm

Re: Avatar

Post by m4shke »

Threedee-shmeedee

If it doesn't have exploding cars, half-naked women and Bruce Willis with guns it's not a movie
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by plained »

andyman wrote:Ask him what we can expect in blu ray from this movie (3d, shit ton of extra features, directors cut, etc)

Also tell him i'm a huge fan sayin EYYYY
Terminator 2 is an absolutely perfect movie IMO and tell him he is the tip of the spear as far as pushing the next big things in movies

that blu ray question is exstreamly good.

cuz he will want to talk about product so there is a good chance he wouldnt not like ey
it is about time!
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Avatar

Post by andyman »

I can see a behind the scenes bit taking up an entire BR disc... that would be toight
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by xer0s »

Like a tiger?
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Avatar

Post by andyman »

you know it
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Avatar

Post by andyman »

feedback
Posts: 7449
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Avatar

Post by feedback »

okay thanks, I'll tell you what he said, if anything, later
I love quake!
Post Reply